Haydon, Roger v Jackson, Gregory John & Ors [1987] FCA 734
The proper orders were those that required the party who received overpayments (Myoora Nominees Pty. Ltd.) to refund the Jacksons the overpaid rent with interest under s.87(2)(c) of the Trade Practices Act, varying the trial judge's order that had imposed joint liability on appellants. The appellants (Haydon and Oxford Estates) were found to have contravened s.52 and remain liable for costs, but not for the monetary refund, as they did not receive overpayments.
- Parties
- Appellant: Roger Haydon; Appellant: Oxford Estates Pty. Ltd.; First Respondent: Gregory John Jackson; First Respondent: Barbara Jackson; First Respondent: Peter John Jackson; First Respondent: Tracey Ellen Jackson; First Respondent: Philip Gregory Jackson; First Respondent: Josephine Jackson; Second Respondent: Martin Anton Mischkulnig; Third Respondent: Myoora Nominees Pty. Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; order for monetary judgment against appellants deleted; orders for costs against all contraveners unchanged.
- Legal Topics
- Misleading and Deceptive Conduct, Damages, Remedies Under Trade Practices Act, Agency, Assessment of Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Roger Haydon
Appellant
Oxford Estates Pty. Ltd.
Appellant
Gregory John Jackson
First Respondent
Barbara Jackson
First Respondent
Peter John Jackson
First Respondent
Tracey Ellen Jackson
First Respondent
Philip Gregory Jackson
First Respondent
Josephine Jackson
First Respondent
Martin Anton Mischkulnig
Second Respondent
Myoora Nominees Pty. Ltd.
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether awards of compensation for overpayment of goodwill and excessive rent were properly made under s.82 or s.87 of the Trade Practices Act 1974
- 2 Who should bear liability to compensate the purchasers under contravention of s.52 of the Trade Practices Act
- 3 Proper method and quantum of assessment of compensation for misleading conduct in sale of a business
Ratio Decidendi
The proper orders were those that required the party who received overpayments (Myoora Nominees Pty. Ltd.) to refund the Jacksons the overpaid rent with interest under s.87(2)(c) of the Trade Practices Act, varying the trial judge's order that had imposed joint liability on appellants. The appellants (Haydon and Oxford Estates) were found to have contravened s.52 and remain liable for costs, but not for the monetary refund, as they did not receive overpayments.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; order for monetary judgment against appellants deleted; orders for costs against all contraveners unchanged.
Orders
- Part of the trial judge's order providing for judgment against Haydon and Oxford Estates in the sum of $43,000 deleted; monetary refund order made only against Myoora Nominees Pty. Ltd.
- Order discharging Jacksons from further liability under bill of sale and mortgage affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment