Evans v Superannuation Complaints Tribunal [2002] FCA 1449
On its proper construction, the Superannuation Act 1976 (Cth) s 137 allows only one election for preservation of superannuation rights; the ameliorative power under s 157(1) to recognise a late election can be exercised only once for an election under s 137(1); subsequent applications are precluded, and the only available further review is by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, not by lodging fresh applications for recognition of late election.
- Parties
- Applicant: Roger Keith Evans; First Respondent: Superannuation Complaints Tribunal; Second Respondent: CSS Board
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Late Election for Preservation of Superannuation Benefits, Jurisdiction of Superannuation Complaints Tribunal, Finality of Decisions and Functus Officio, Statutory Construction of Superannuation Act 1976 S 137 and S 157
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Roger Keith Evans
Applicant
Superannuation Complaints Tribunal
First Respondent
CSS Board
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether more than one election may be made under Superannuation Act 1976 (Cth) s 137
- 2 Whether power to recognise late election under s 157 can be exercised more than once
- 3 Jurisdiction of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal over pre-regulation decisions
Ratio Decidendi
On its proper construction, the Superannuation Act 1976 (Cth) s 137 allows only one election for preservation of superannuation rights; the ameliorative power under s 157(1) to recognise a late election can be exercised only once for an election under s 137(1); subsequent applications are precluded, and the only available further review is by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, not by lodging fresh applications for recognition of late election.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application be dismissed
- The applicant pay the costs of the second respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment