Application for a writ of mandamus against Hassell, Roland Patrick & Ors Ex Parte Norman, Elys Francis the Commonwealth of Australia [1984] FCA 244
For the reasons stated in the judgment on the similar application of Mrs. Pride, the application for a writ of prohibition must be dismissed as the Tribunal's actions are within its investigative function.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Elys Frances Norman; Respondent: Roland Patrick Hassell; Respondent: Desmond Matthen Tehan; Respondent: Stanley McLeish Harris; Respondent: Repatriation Review Tribunal; Third Party: The Commonwealth of Australia
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Writ of Prohibition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Repatriation, Jurisdiction of Tribunals, Reviewability of Summons, Attendance of Applicant, Investigative Function of Tribunal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elys Frances Norman
Prosecutor
Roland Patrick Hassell
Respondent
Desmond Matthen Tehan
Respondent
Stanley McLeish Harris
Respondent
Repatriation Review Tribunal
Respondent
The Commonwealth of Australia
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Application for Writ of Prohibition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the issuing of a summons by the Repatriation Review Tribunal is capable of review
- 2 Whether the Tribunal may require the applicant to attend to give evidence
- 3 Investigative function of the Tribunal under the Repatriation Act 1920
Ratio Decidendi
For the reasons stated in the judgment on the similar application of Mrs. Pride, the application for a writ of prohibition must be dismissed as the Tribunal's actions are within its investigative function.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for a writ of prohibition against Roland Patrick Hassell, Desmond Matthen Tehan and Stanley McLeish Harris be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment