Phan v Wear [2008] NSWLEC 1450
The Court found there has been no damage to the applicant's property nor injury to persons, but a section of tree 2 could in the near future cause some damage. Thus, the jurisdiction of the Court was triggered under s 10(2), leading to an order for partial removal and deadwood pruning only.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Tree Dispute Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application upheld in part
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'neighbourhood Disputes' 'remedies for Tree Related Issues']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Tree Dispute Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the trees on the respondent's property pose a risk of damage to the applicant's property or injury to persons" 'Whether removal or pruning of the trees is warranted under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found there has been no damage to the applicant's property nor injury to persons, but a section of tree 2 could in the near future cause some damage. Thus, the jurisdiction of the Court was triggered under s 10(2), leading to an order for partial removal and deadwood pruning only.
Court Disposition
Application upheld in part
Orders
- ['Section of tree 2 most likely to fail to be removed to point indicated on photograph' 'Work to be carried out by AQF level III arborist with appropriate insurance and per WorkCover NSW Code of Practice' 'Respondent to pay wholly for removal from tree 2' "Deadwood down to 30 mm in diameter to be removed from tree...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment