In the matter of Rocha Pty Limited (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1172
At the time of repeal of the (NSW) Companies Act 1961, the plaintiff had no substantive right or entitlement defined by reference to past facts. He had only standing as a person interested to apply for the Court's favourable exercise of discretion under s 307. That procedural right or mere locus standi was not an acquired or accrued right for the purposes of (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987, s 30(1)(c), so the repeal did not preserve any right to make the application and the Court declined to set aside the prior dismissal order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Application Concerning Dissolution of Company / Application to Set Aside Prior Order Dismissing Application for Declaration That Dissolution Was Void
- Outcome
- Application to set aside the order of 29 June 2016 dismissing the plaintiff's application was declined.
- Legal Topics
- ['dissolution of Company' 'striking Off of Defunct Company' 'reinstatement' 'repeal of Legislation' 'preservation of Accrued Rights' 'discretionary Relief']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application Concerning Dissolution of Company / Application to Set Aside Prior Order Dismissing Application for Declaration That Dissolution Was Void
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiff had an acquired or accrued right under (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987, s 30(1)(c), to make an application under s 307 of the (NSW) Companies Act 1961 after that Act was repealed.' 'Whether the Court retained jurisdiction to make an order under s 307 of the (NSW) Companies Act 1961 notwithstanding repeal of that Act before the commencement of the proceedings.' 'Whether a mere right or standing to apply for a favourable exercise of discretion is an acquired or accrued right.']
Ratio Decidendi
At the time of repeal of the (NSW) Companies Act 1961, the plaintiff had no substantive right or entitlement defined by reference to past facts. He had only standing as a person interested to apply for the Court's favourable exercise of discretion under s 307. That procedural right or mere locus standi was not an acquired or accrued right for the purposes of (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987, s 30(1)(c), so the repeal did not preserve any right to make the application and the Court declined to set aside the prior dismissal order.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside the order of 29 June 2016 dismissing the plaintiff's application was declined.
Orders
- ["Decline to set aside the order of 29 June 2016 dismissing the plaintiff's application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment