Romiz Constructions v Byrnes [2010] NSWSC 26

Romiz Constructions v Byrnes [2010] NSWSC 26

The court declined to stay the writ of possession as the defendant failed to provide satisfactory evidence of available funds or reasons for repeated missed payments, and the balance of hardship did not warrant the stay given the broken agreements.

Parties
Plaintiff: Romiz Constructions; Defendant: Catherine Gina Lisa Byrnes
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 January 2010
Procedural Posture
Mortgage Possession Proceedings / Application for Stay of Execution of Writ of Possession
Outcome
Application for stay of execution denied
Legal Topics
Mortgages, Stay of Execution, Possession Orders
Property Law Equity Mortgages Stay of Execution Possession Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Romiz Constructions

Plaintiff

Catherine Gina Lisa Byrnes

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Mortgage Possession Proceedings / Application for Stay of Execution of Writ of Possession

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether to grant a stay of execution of the writ of possession against the mortgagor's residence
  2. 2 Whether the defendant demonstrated capacity to pay the amount owing under the mortgage
  3. 3 Effect of prior agreements to compromise the amount due

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to stay the writ of possession as the defendant failed to provide satisfactory evidence of available funds or reasons for repeated missed payments, and the balance of hardship did not warrant the stay given the broken agreements.

Court Disposition

Application for stay of execution denied

Orders

  • Decline to stay the writ of possession