Dunbier v Smith & Anor [2000] NSWSC 51
The costs assessor did not err in law in accepting the defendants' uncontested evidence as to the terms of the retainer, finding that there was no agreement entitling the plaintiff to costs beyond out-of-pocket expenses, and was entitled to reach this view given the plaintiff's failure to respond or supply an alternative version. Natural justice was not denied.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ronald Ashley Dunbier; First Defendant: David John Smith; Second Defendant: Annette Clare Smith
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Costs Assessor / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused; plaintiff to pay defendants' costs.
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor Client Costs, Retainer, Natural Justice, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ronald Ashley Dunbier
Plaintiff
David John Smith
First Defendant
Annette Clare Smith
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Costs Assessor / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the costs assessor erred in law in finding no retainer entitling the plaintiff to costs
- 2 Whether there was a denial of natural justice to the plaintiff
- 3 Whether out-of-pocket expenses and disbursements should have been allowed
Ratio Decidendi
The costs assessor did not err in law in accepting the defendants' uncontested evidence as to the terms of the retainer, finding that there was no agreement entitling the plaintiff to costs beyond out-of-pocket expenses, and was entitled to reach this view given the plaintiff's failure to respond or supply an alternative version. Natural justice was not denied.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused; plaintiff to pay defendants' costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- Leave to appeal is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment