Bathis v Wallaby Grip (BAE) Pty Limited [2004] NSWDDT 13
The defendant owed and breached a duty of care by failing to protect the plaintiff from unsafe concentrations of asbestos dust and fibre between 1974 and 1977, causing him to contract asbestos related pleural disease. Liability was also established under the relevant statutory provisions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Claim for Provisional Damages / Judgment
- Outcome
- verdict for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- ['negligence' 'breach of Statutory Duty' 'asbestos Related Disease' 'workplace Safety']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Claim for Provisional Damages / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant owed and breached a duty of care to the plaintiff regarding exposure to asbestos dust and fibre in the workplace' "Whether the plaintiff's injury (asbestos related pleural disease) was caused by such exposure" 'Whether the defendant breached statutory duties under s 25(2) of the Factories and Shops Act 1912 and s 41(2) of the Factories, Shops and Industry Act 1962']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant owed and breached a duty of care by failing to protect the plaintiff from unsafe concentrations of asbestos dust and fibre between 1974 and 1977, causing him to contract asbestos related pleural disease. Liability was also established under the relevant statutory provisions.
Court Disposition
verdict for the plaintiff
Orders
- ['Plaintiff awarded provisional damages of $65,946' "Defendant to pay plaintiff's costs" 'Plaintiff may claim further damages should he develop asbestosis, asbestos related lung cancer, pleural mesothelioma, peritoneal mesothelioma, or asbestos induced carcinoma of any other bodily organ']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment