Coshott v Spencer [2022] NSWSC 824
The Local Court had power, both under the slip rule and its implied administrative powers, to correct a clerical error by varying the judgment sum to reflect the proper amount in the Costs Assessment Certificate, and such correction did not render the original judgment a nullity. The appeal should be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judgments and Orders' 'amending, Varying and Setting Aside' 'correction Under Slip Rule' 'appeals From Local Court' 'overriding Purpose of Civil Procedure Act 2005 S 56']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Local Court had the power to vary the judgment issued for $17,094 to reduce it to $17,004 under the slip rule or its implied power to correct its records' 'Whether the original judgment was a nullity due to inclusion of the $90 filing fee' 'Whether the variation order made by the Magistrate was valid']
Ratio Decidendi
The Local Court had power, both under the slip rule and its implied administrative powers, to correct a clerical error by varying the judgment sum to reflect the proper amount in the Costs Assessment Certificate, and such correction did not render the original judgment a nullity. The appeal should be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Summons commencing an Appeal filed 26 October 2020 is dismissed.' "Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs." 'If either party seeks an order different from Order (2), then any submission seeking such order together with any affidavit in support is to be filed and served within 21 days of this judgment. Any...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment