Griffin v Ingram [2014] NSWCATAP 5
As the landlords’ application was made under ss 84 and 187 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) in its post-1 January 2014 form and not under cl 9 of Schedule 1 to the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), the resulting decision was an 'internally appealable decision' and the Appeal Panel of NCAT had jurisdiction to hear the appeal and consider the stay application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Residential Tenancy Appeal / Stay Application Pending Substantive Appeal Before Appeal Panel of NCAT
- Outcome
- Stay granted (pending appeal); orders of 29 January 2014, except Order 4, stayed.
- Legal Topics
- ['transitional Provisions' 'jurisdiction of NCAT on Appeal' 'residential Tenancy Termination and Possession Orders' 'stay of Orders Pending Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Residential Tenancy Appeal / Stay Application Pending Substantive Appeal Before Appeal Panel of NCAT
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Appeal Panel of NCAT had jurisdiction to determine the appeal given transitional legislative provisions and the nature of the application at first instance' 'Appropriate circumstances for granting a stay of possession orders pending appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
As the landlords’ application was made under ss 84 and 187 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) in its post-1 January 2014 form and not under cl 9 of Schedule 1 to the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), the resulting decision was an 'internally appealable decision' and the Appeal Panel of NCAT had jurisdiction to hear the appeal and consider the stay application.
Court Disposition
Stay granted (pending appeal); orders of 29 January 2014, except Order 4, stayed.
Orders
- ['Leave granted for parties to be represented at hearing and appeal.' 'Orders of 29 January 2014, except Order 4, are stayed until further order.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment