Dean-Willcocks v ATTT Investments Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 642

Dean-Willcocks v ATTT Investments Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 642

The proposed arrangement did not amount to a 'compromise' within s 477(2A) as there was no genuine dispute about the claims being settled; as such, Court approval was not legally required, but, even if required, insufficient independent evidence and details were provided for Court endorsement at this stage.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 June 1999
Procedural Posture
Application Under Corporations Law S 477(2 A) / Interlocutory – Application for Court Approval of Compromise/arrangement
Outcome
No order made at this stage; matter stood over with liberty to apply.
Legal Topics
["liquidator's Powers" 'compromise or Arrangement With Creditors' 'court Approval Requirements']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Under Corporations Law S 477(2 A) / Interlocutory – Application for Court Approval of Compromise/arrangement

  1. 1 ["Whether the proposed deal is a 'compromise' or 'arrangement' under s 477(2A) of the Corporations Law" 'What the Court must consider when asked to approve a compromise by a liquidator' 'Whether sufficient and independent evidence has been presented to justify court approval']

Ratio Decidendi

The proposed arrangement did not amount to a 'compromise' within s 477(2A) as there was no genuine dispute about the claims being settled; as such, Court approval was not legally required, but, even if required, insufficient independent evidence and details were provided for Court endorsement at this stage.

Court Disposition

No order made at this stage; matter stood over with liberty to apply.

Orders

  • ['Matter stood over to 9.30am on Tuesday 29 June 1999 with liberty to apply.']