WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Howard) v Ronald Joseph Bezzina and Peter Butterfield [2001] NSWIRComm 328

WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Howard) v Ronald Joseph Bezzina and Peter Butterfield [2001] NSWIRComm 328

Given the partnership structure, lack of prior convictions, the factual findings regarding scaffolding, and in light of the seriousness of the offence, each defendant is fined $7,500 (half of a total $15,000 penalty) and convicted. No costs order in favour of any party is made; each party is to pay its own costs.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 December 2001
Procedural Posture
Prosecution / Sentencing and Costs
Outcome
Each defendant convicted on the scaffolding charge; penalty imposed; each party to pay its own costs.
Legal Topics
['prosecution Under Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983' 'penalty Assessment' 'costs in Criminal Proceedings' 'principle of Totality' 'proportionality and Consistency of Sentencing']
['occupational Health and Safety' 'industrial Law'] ['prosecution Under Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983' 'penalty Assessment' 'costs in Criminal Proceedings' 'principle of Totality' 'proportionality and Consistency of Sentencing']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Prosecution / Sentencing and Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['What penalty is appropriate for breaches of ss16(2) and 17(1)(a) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 given the facts found?' 'How should costs be allocated given the outcome of the prosecutions and the conduct of the parties?']

Ratio Decidendi

Given the partnership structure, lack of prior convictions, the factual findings regarding scaffolding, and in light of the seriousness of the offence, each defendant is fined $7,500 (half of a total $15,000 penalty) and convicted. No costs order in favour of any party is made; each party is to pay its own costs.

Court Disposition

Each defendant convicted on the scaffolding charge; penalty imposed; each party to pay its own costs.

Orders

  • ['Each defendant is convicted of the charge relating to scaffolding.' 'A fine of $7,500 is imposed on each defendant, with a moiety to WorkCover.' 'Each party is to pay its own costs.']