LOO v RURAL PRESS PTY LTD [2003] NSWSC 107
The sets of imputations differ in substance, and each imputation, as amended, is capable of being carried by the matters complained of and is capable of being defamatory. The suspicion imputations can be amended to specify the identity of suspicion holders.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Interlocutory Decision Regarding Imputations and Directions to Trial
- Outcome
- Orders made regarding trial of issues, amendment of pleadings, exchange of outlines of evidence, and costs. Defendant to pay plaintiff’s costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['imputation' 'difference in Substance' 'defamation Act' 'capacity of Publication' 'trial by Jury']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Interlocutory Decision Regarding Imputations and Directions to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether sets of imputations differ in substance' "Whether 'suspicion' imputations are defective for lack of identity of suspicion holders" 'Whether each imputation is capable of being carried by the matters complained of and capable of being defamatory']
Ratio Decidendi
The sets of imputations differ in substance, and each imputation, as amended, is capable of being carried by the matters complained of and is capable of being defamatory. The suspicion imputations can be amended to specify the identity of suspicion holders.
Court Disposition
Orders made regarding trial of issues, amendment of pleadings, exchange of outlines of evidence, and costs. Defendant to pay plaintiff’s costs.
Orders
- ['Matter referred to the list for call up for a s7A trial by jury pursuant to the Defamation Act.' 'Defendant to file defence to relevant issues within 14 days.' 'No requirement for plaintiff to file amended statement of claim if the amendment of suspicion imputations is made clear for the trial.' 'Parties to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment