T.N.T. Management Pty Ltd & Ors v. Bannerman, Ronald Moore & Anor [1980] FCA 169

T.N.T. Management Pty Ltd & Ors v. Bannerman, Ronald Moore & Anor [1980] FCA 169

Because the s.155 notices were issued and served after the Trade Practices Commission had commenced proceedings for pecuniary penalties, and in light of the Court's conclusion that s.155 did not provide power to issue such notices in those circumstances, each notice the subject of the proceedings was null and void and of no legal effect.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 November 1980
Procedural Posture
Applications Under S.163 a of the Trade Practices Act 1974 for Declarations That Notices Purportedly Issued Under S.155 Were Not Authorised, in the Context of Penalty and Injunction Proceedings Under the Trade Practices Act 1974 / Reasons for Judgment and Orders Declaring the Notices Null and Void and Ordering Costs
Outcome
Applications allowed; the specified s.155 notices were declared null and void and of no legal effect, and the Trade Practices Commission was ordered to pay costs.
Legal Topics
['validity of S.155 Notices' 'pecuniary Penalty Proceedings' 'investigatory Powers After Commencement of Proceedings' 'discovery and Interrogatories in Penalty Proceedings' 'common Law Privilege Against Self Incrimination']
['trade Practices' 'administrative Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['validity of S.155 Notices' 'pecuniary Penalty Proceedings' 'investigatory Powers After Commencement of Proceedings' 'discovery and Interrogatories in Penalty Proceedings' 'common Law Privilege Against Self Incrimination']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Applications Under S.163 a of the Trade Practices Act 1974 for Declarations That Notices Purportedly Issued Under S.155 Were Not Authorised, in the Context of Penalty and Injunction Proceedings Under the Trade Practices Act 1974 / Reasons for Judgment and Orders Declaring the Notices Null and Void and Ordering Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether notices issued by the Chairman of the Trade Practices Commission and served after commencement of proceedings for pecuniary penalties were authorised by s.155 of the Trade Practices Act 1974.' 'Whether s.155 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 should be interpreted consistently with the common law privilege expressed in the maxim nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare.' "Whether the Trade Practices Commission's power under s.155 was spent once proceedings had been commenced."]

Ratio Decidendi

Because the s.155 notices were issued and served after the Trade Practices Commission had commenced proceedings for pecuniary penalties, and in light of the Court's conclusion that s.155 did not provide power to issue such notices in those circumstances, each notice the subject of the proceedings was null and void and of no legal effect.

Court Disposition

Applications allowed; the specified s.155 notices were declared null and void and of no legal effect, and the Trade Practices Commission was ordered to pay costs.

Orders

  • ['The Court declares that each of the notices dated 20 March 1980 addressed to T.N.T. Management Pty. Limited, 21 March 1980 addressed to Brambles Holdings Limited, 21 March 1980 addressed to Mayne Nickless Limited, 20 March 1980 addressed to Youngs Transport Pty. Limited, 21 March 1980 addressed to Ansett Transport...