Francis v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2016] FCA 639

Francis v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2016] FCA 639

The applicant's identified grounds of appeal are either not questions of law, not relevant, or have no reasonable prospect of success. Summary judgment is appropriate as the applicant cannot succeed in his appeal on a question of law.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 June 2016
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Summary Judgment Application on Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed by summary judgment
Legal Topics
['summary Judgment' 'vexatious Applicant Declarations' 'freedom of Information' 'abuse of Process']
['administrative Law' 'practice and Procedure'] ['summary Judgment' 'vexatious Applicant Declarations' 'freedom of Information' 'abuse of Process']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Summary Judgment Application on Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicant has a reasonable prospect of successfully prosecuting the appeal' "Whether the applicant's challenges raise an arguable question of law" 'Whether the Tribunal erred in upholding the vexatious applicant declaration']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's identified grounds of appeal are either not questions of law, not relevant, or have no reasonable prospect of success. Summary judgment is appropriate as the applicant cannot succeed in his appeal on a question of law.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed by summary judgment

Orders

  • ['Pursuant to s 31A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) the appeal be dismissed.']