Chen v Liu [2017] NSWSC 1767
The plaintiff and defendant held the apartment as tenants in common in the proportions of their respective contributions, 69.87% and 30.13%. Those proportions determined their share in the net proceeds of sale, after repayment of liabilities to the mortgagee. The resulting trust arose at purchase and was not affected by later dealings or repayments. Costs ordered against the defendant in favour of the plaintiff at 80%.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings / Post Sale Distribution of Proceeds, Costs Orders Pending
- Outcome
- Direct the plaintiff to bring in short minutes to give effect to the conclusions; orders as to costs made; distribution of sale proceeds as specified.
- Legal Topics
- ['resulting Trusts' 'purchase Money Trusts' 'appointment of Trustees for Sale']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings / Post Sale Distribution of Proceeds, Costs Orders Pending
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the apartment was held by the parties on trust in proportion to their contributions' 'How the trust affects distribution of net sale proceeds' 'Entitlement to account for outgoings, occupation fee, and interest payments' 'Appropriate order for costs']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff and defendant held the apartment as tenants in common in the proportions of their respective contributions, 69.87% and 30.13%. Those proportions determined their share in the net proceeds of sale, after repayment of liabilities to the mortgagee. The resulting trust arose at purchase and was not affected by later dealings or repayments. Costs ordered against the defendant in favour of the plaintiff at 80%.
Court Disposition
Direct the plaintiff to bring in short minutes to give effect to the conclusions; orders as to costs made; distribution of sale proceeds as specified.
Orders
- ['Plaintiff to bring in short minutes of orders to give effect to reasons dated 18 December 2017.' 'Net sale proceeds to be distributed: plaintiff 69.87%, defendant 30.13%, less discharge of joint loan.' "Defendant to pay 80% of plaintiff's costs out of defendant's share of proceeds."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment