WATERSIDE WORKERS' FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIA v RONHER PTY LIMITED [1988] NSWCA 168

WATERSIDE WORKERS' FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIA v RONHER PTY LIMITED [1988] NSWCA 168

Section 6(1) of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 does not require a demonstrated error of law by the trial judge for the grant of a certificate; the statute's beneficial purpose supports granting a certificate when an appeal succeeds on a question of law.

Parties
Claimant: Waterside Workers' Federation of Australia; Respondent: Ronher Pty Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 July 1988
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Appeal Motion
Outcome
Certificate granted under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 in respect of the costs of the appeal; no order as to costs of the motion.
Legal Topics
Costs, Suitors' Fund Certificate, Judicial Discretion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Waterside Workers' Federation of Australia

Claimant

Ronher Pty Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Post Appeal Motion

  1. 1 Entitlement to certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 when appeal succeeds on a question of law
  2. 2 Whether section 6(1) requires proof of error by the trial judge for certificate to issue
  3. 3 Nature of court's discretion under section 6(1) of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951

Ratio Decidendi

Section 6(1) of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 does not require a demonstrated error of law by the trial judge for the grant of a certificate; the statute's beneficial purpose supports granting a certificate when an appeal succeeds on a question of law.

Court Disposition

Certificate granted under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 in respect of the costs of the appeal; no order as to costs of the motion.

Orders

  • The claimant be granted a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 in respect of the costs of the appeal.
  • No order as to the costs of the motion.