Steinle-Davies v Inner West Council [2025] NSWCATAD 55
The public interest considerations against disclosure, including the protection of confidential submissions and personal information, outweigh the considerations in favour of disclosure in this case, especially since the subject public engagement process is no longer relevant; as such, the respondent's decision to refuse or limit access is affirmed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Rory Steinle-Davies; Respondent: Inner West Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Hearing and Final Decision
- Outcome
- Respondent's decision affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Government Information, Public Interest Test, Confidentiality, Freedom of Information, Local Government
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rory Steinle-Davies
Applicant
Inner West Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Hearing and Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is an overriding public interest against disclosure of government information under the GIPA Act
- 2 Whether the Council's decision to refuse or limit access to information requested in the GIPA application was correct and preferable
Ratio Decidendi
The public interest considerations against disclosure, including the protection of confidential submissions and personal information, outweigh the considerations in favour of disclosure in this case, especially since the subject public engagement process is no longer relevant; as such, the respondent's decision to refuse or limit access is affirmed.
Court Disposition
Respondent's decision affirmed
Orders
- Pursuant to s 64(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), the publication or disclosure of documentation lodged by the respondent with the Tribunal on a confidential basis and the parts of these Reasons marked 'NOT FOR PUBLICATION', other than to the respondent (Inner West Council), are...
- The respondent's decision dated 17 May 2024 is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment