Steinle-Davies v Inner West Council [2025] NSWCATAD 55

Steinle-Davies v Inner West Council [2025] NSWCATAD 55

The public interest considerations against disclosure, including the protection of confidential submissions and personal information, outweigh the considerations in favour of disclosure in this case, especially since the subject public engagement process is no longer relevant; as such, the respondent's decision to refuse or limit access is affirmed.

Parties
Applicant: Rory Steinle-Davies; Respondent: Inner West Council
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 March 2025
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Hearing and Final Decision
Outcome
Respondent's decision affirmed
Legal Topics
Government Information, Public Interest Test, Confidentiality, Freedom of Information, Local Government

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rory Steinle-Davies

Applicant

Inner West Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Administrative Review / Hearing and Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether there is an overriding public interest against disclosure of government information under the GIPA Act
  2. 2 Whether the Council's decision to refuse or limit access to information requested in the GIPA application was correct and preferable

Ratio Decidendi

The public interest considerations against disclosure, including the protection of confidential submissions and personal information, outweigh the considerations in favour of disclosure in this case, especially since the subject public engagement process is no longer relevant; as such, the respondent's decision to refuse or limit access is affirmed.

Court Disposition

Respondent's decision affirmed

Orders

  • Pursuant to s 64(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), the publication or disclosure of documentation lodged by the respondent with the Tribunal on a confidential basis and the parts of these Reasons marked 'NOT FOR PUBLICATION', other than to the respondent (Inner West Council), are...
  • The respondent's decision dated 17 May 2024 is affirmed.