Rose Bay Marina Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2015] NSWLEC 1143
The modifications to permit longer boats do not create a material adverse visual impact, as the height remains unchanged and the additional length is only visible from limited vantage points, satisfying relevant planning controls; therefore, the appeal is upheld and the development consent is modified accordingly.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent Modification' 'visual Impact' 'public Views' 'marina Redevelopment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether modification to increase the approved boat length from 30m to 37m for four berths is consistent with planning controls and has acceptable visual impact' 'Whether the proposal complies with statutory requirements for maintaining, protecting and enhancing views to and from public places']
Ratio Decidendi
The modifications to permit longer boats do not create a material adverse visual impact, as the height remains unchanged and the additional length is only visible from limited vantage points, satisfying relevant planning controls; therefore, the appeal is upheld and the development consent is modified accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- ['Modification Application No. 682/2008/3 to modify Development Consent No. 682/2008 for the redevelopment of Rose Bay Marina at 594-596 New South Head Road, Rose Bay, is approved as set out in Annexure A.' 'Development Consent No. 682/2008 is now subject to the consolidated, modified conditions set out in Annexure...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment