Rose v Hvric [1963] HCA 13

Rose v Hvric [1963] HCA 13

Section 74(1) of the Justices Act 1958 (Vict) is not excluded by the provisions of s. 154(1)(b) of the Licensing Act 1958 (Vict), as the latter does not expressly or implicitly contradict the former. Therefore, a court of petty sessions may impose a pecuniary penalty instead of imprisonment for a second or subsequent offence under s. 154(1)(b).

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['statutory Interpretation' 'sentencing' 'licensing Offences']
['criminal Law'] ['statutory Interpretation' 'sentencing' 'licensing Offences']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether s. 74(1) of the Justices Act 1958 (Vict) authorises a court of petty sessions to impose a pecuniary penalty instead of imprisonment for a second or subsequent offence under s. 154(1)(b) of the Licensing Act 1958 (Vict)']

Ratio Decidendi

Section 74(1) of the Justices Act 1958 (Vict) is not excluded by the provisions of s. 154(1)(b) of the Licensing Act 1958 (Vict), as the latter does not expressly or implicitly contradict the former. Therefore, a court of petty sessions may impose a pecuniary penalty instead of imprisonment for a second or subsequent offence under s. 154(1)(b).

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']