Bullen v Mangano [2024] FCA 1199

Bullen v Mangano [2024] FCA 1199

The respondent failed to provide adequate and reliable evidence of her full financial position, especially in regard to liabilities, and failed to meet the onus of proving solvency. Therefore, the Court was not satisfied that she could pay her debts as required by s 52(2)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), and made a sequestration order against her estate.

Parties
Applicant: Rosemary Bullen; Respondent: Silvana Mangano
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Creditor's Petition (bankruptcy) / Hearing and Decision
Outcome
Sequestration order made; applicant creditor’s costs to be paid from debtor’s estate.
Legal Topics
Sequestration Order, Creditor’s Petition, Debtor’s Solvency, Bankruptcy Act 1966 (cth) S 52(2)(a)
Bankruptcy and Insolvency Sequestration Order Creditor’s Petition Debtor’s Solvency Bankruptcy Act 1966 (cth) S 52(2)(a)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rosemary Bullen

Applicant

Silvana Mangano

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Creditor's Petition (bankruptcy) / Hearing and Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent debtor is able to pay her debts within the meaning of s 52(2)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
  2. 2 Whether a sequestration order should be made notwithstanding the debtor’s assertions of solvency
  3. 3 The relevance and sufficiency of evidence required to prove solvency on a creditor’s petition

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent failed to provide adequate and reliable evidence of her full financial position, especially in regard to liabilities, and failed to meet the onus of proving solvency. Therefore, the Court was not satisfied that she could pay her debts as required by s 52(2)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), and made a sequestration order against her estate.

Court Disposition

Sequestration order made; applicant creditor’s costs to be paid from debtor’s estate.

Orders

  • The estate of Silvana Mangano be sequestrated under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
  • The applicant creditor’s costs of the petition be paid from the estate of the respondent debtor in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act.