Stevenson v A/Prof Morgan [2015] NSWSC 1230
Given the disparate expertise of the authors of the reports and the principle that only those experts who opine on a topic should attend conclaves on that topic, it is inappropriate to require Mr Iyer and Ms Morris to participate in the joint conference with the rehabilitation physicians.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Rosemary Theresa Stevenson; 1st Defendant: Associate Professor Gary John Morgan; 2nd Defendant: Western Sydney Local Health Network
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Medical Negligence / Interlocutory Motion (composition of Expert Joint Conference)
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's motion granted
- Legal Topics
- Expert Evidence, Joint Conference of Experts, Damages Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rosemary Theresa Stevenson
Plaintiff
Associate Professor Gary John Morgan
1st Defendant
Western Sydney Local Health Network
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Medical Negligence / Interlocutory Motion (composition of Expert Joint Conference)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether vocational assessor and occupational therapist should participate in joint conference with rehabilitation physicians in damages aspect of medical negligence claim
Ratio Decidendi
Given the disparate expertise of the authors of the reports and the principle that only those experts who opine on a topic should attend conclaves on that topic, it is inappropriate to require Mr Iyer and Ms Morris to participate in the joint conference with the rehabilitation physicians.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's motion granted
Orders
- Mr Shyam Iyer and Ms Rachel Morris are not required to participate in the joint conference between Associate Professor Richard Jones and Dr Lorraine Jones.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment