Koschuetzke v Katz [2009] NSWIRComm 152

Koschuetzke v Katz [2009] NSWIRComm 152

Leave to appeal should be refused because no public interest or substantial issue of principle or law was demonstrated; the grounds of appeal related to adequacy of compensation and factual matters, which do not warrant appellate intervention.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 September 2009
Procedural Posture
Unfair Dismissal Application and Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal
Outcome
leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['unfair Dismissal' 'leave to Appeal' 'compensation']
['industrial Relations'] ['unfair Dismissal' 'leave to Appeal' 'compensation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Unfair Dismissal Application and Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted regarding the amount of compensation awarded for unfair dismissal.' 'Whether the evidence and reasons for the earlier decision warrant appellate review.']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal should be refused because no public interest or substantial issue of principle or law was demonstrated; the grounds of appeal related to adequacy of compensation and factual matters, which do not warrant appellate intervention.

Court Disposition

leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal refused.' 'Appeal dismissed.']