WorkCover Authority of NSW (Inspector Farrell) v Ross Colin Morrison (No.2) [2002] NSWIRComm 27

WorkCover Authority of NSW (Inspector Farrell) v Ross Colin Morrison (No.2) [2002] NSWIRComm 27

The defendant, a self-employed swimming pool builder, became aware that the mesh covering a partially filled pool had been removed but took no steps to ensure it was replaced or that other safety measures were implemented. Even accepting his limited site control, he failed to discharge his statutory duty under s16(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act to proactively ensure non-employees were not exposed to foreseeable risks arising from his undertaking. The risk of harm—demonstrated by a child's death—was foreseeable and avoidable, and it was not reasonable for the defendant to rely on others without ensuring compliance himself. Accordingly, his culpability was equal to the on-site...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 March 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing After Conviction
Outcome
Conviction and fine imposed; costs reserved
Legal Topics
['failure to Ensure Safety of Non Employees' 'risk Management on Construction Sites' 'sentencing Principles Under the Occupational Health and Safety Act' 'section 10 of the Crimes (sentencing Procedure) Act 1999']
['occupational Health and Safety' 'industrial Law' 'criminal Law'] ['failure to Ensure Safety of Non Employees' 'risk Management on Construction Sites' 'sentencing Principles Under the Occupational Health and Safety Act' 'section 10 of the Crimes (sentencing Procedure) Act 1999']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing After Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the defendant, a self-employed pool builder, failed to ensure that persons not in his employment were not exposed to risks to health or safety from his undertaking at his place of work, contrary to s16(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983' 'Whether circumstances warranted application of s10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (no conviction recorded)']

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant, a self-employed swimming pool builder, became aware that the mesh covering a partially filled pool had been removed but took no steps to ensure it was replaced or that other safety measures were implemented. Even accepting his limited site control, he failed to discharge his statutory duty under s16(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act to proactively ensure non-employees were not exposed to foreseeable risks arising from his undertaking. The risk of harm—demonstrated by a child's death—was foreseeable and avoidable, and it was not reasonable for the defendant to rely on others without ensuring compliance himself. Accordingly, his culpability was equal to the on-site...

Court Disposition

Conviction and fine imposed; costs reserved

Orders

  • ['The defendant is fined an amount of $10,000 with a moiety thereof to the prosecutor.' 'Costs are reserved until receipt of further submissions from the prosecutor and the defendant.']