Ross John McIntyre v The Queen [1982] FCA 297
The absence of proper jury warning concerning the danger of convicting on uncorroborated evidence of accomplices in relation to the conspiracy charge, together with insufficient independent corroboration, constituted a miscarriage of justice requiring quashing that conviction and ordering a new trial. For charges under the Prohibited Drugs Act, sufficient independent corroboration existed such that no miscarriage of justice occurred, so those convictions stand.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- ['conspiracy' 'evidence' 'corroboration' 'miscarriage of Justice' 'judicial Warnings' 'adjournment' 'legal Representation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Was the refusal to grant adjournment after withdrawal of legal representation erroneous?' 'Did the admission of prejudicial and inadmissible evidence result in miscarriage of justice?' 'Did the trial judge adequately warn the jury about the evidence of accomplices/co-conspirators?' 'Was there sufficient corroboration independent of accomplice evidence to sustain a conviction?']
Ratio Decidendi
The absence of proper jury warning concerning the danger of convicting on uncorroborated evidence of accomplices in relation to the conspiracy charge, together with insufficient independent corroboration, constituted a miscarriage of justice requiring quashing that conviction and ordering a new trial. For charges under the Prohibited Drugs Act, sufficient independent corroboration existed such that no miscarriage of justice occurred, so those convictions stand.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- ['Conviction for conspiracy quashed and new trial ordered' 'Appeal otherwise dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment