Ross Mining NL, in the matter of Donnelly v Donnelly [1999] FCA 1343

Ross Mining NL, in the matter of Donnelly v Donnelly [1999] FCA 1343

No order as to costs was appropriate because, although the petition had been dismissed and the respondents may have been brought to court unnecessarily, the respondents had generally been unsuccessful on the separately determined service issue and no defence other than non-service of the bankruptcy notice was raised until after considerable costs had been incurred.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 September 1999
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Sequestration Petition / Argument on Costs After Dismissal of the Petition
Outcome
No order as to the costs of the proceeding.
Legal Topics
['sequestration Petition' 'bankruptcy Notice' 'service' 'costs' 'litigant in Person Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy Sequestration Petition / Argument on Costs After Dismissal of the Petition

  1. 1 ['Whether any order should be made as to the costs of the proceeding after the petition was dismissed.' "Whether the respondents' circumstances, including being unrepresented by qualified legal practitioners and the earlier contest about service of the bankruptcy notice, justified a costs order."]

Ratio Decidendi

No order as to costs was appropriate because, although the petition had been dismissed and the respondents may have been brought to court unnecessarily, the respondents had generally been unsuccessful on the separately determined service issue and no defence other than non-service of the bankruptcy notice was raised until after considerable costs had been incurred.

Court Disposition

No order as to the costs of the proceeding.

Orders

  • ['There be no order as to the costs of the proceeding.']