Wily v Rothschild [1999] NSWSC 920
Leave to amend the statement of claim is granted because the facts underlying the claims are substantially the same, the main difference being timing, and there is no prejudice to the defendant beyond the risk of amendment. The application falls within the Rules permitting amendment, especially as limitation period would otherwise bar the claim.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Amend Statement of Claim / Post Hearing; Decision on Amendment
- Outcome
- Amendment allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Pleadings' "liquidator's Claim Against Void Transactions" 'limitation Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Amend Statement of Claim / Post Hearing; Decision on Amendment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to amend the statement of claim after hearing concluded' 'Whether amendment is allowed when limitation period has expired']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend the statement of claim is granted because the facts underlying the claims are substantially the same, the main difference being timing, and there is no prejudice to the defendant beyond the risk of amendment. The application falls within the Rules permitting amendment, especially as limitation period would otherwise bar the claim.
Court Disposition
Amendment allowed
Orders
- ['Leave granted to plaintiffs to amend statement of claim by filing document in the form of Exhibit Y.' 'Exhibit Y deemed filed and stands as amended statement of claim.' 'Exhibit Z deemed filed and stands as defence to amended statement of claim.' "Plaintiffs to pay defendant's costs of the notice of motion."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment