Regina v RTGS [2005] NSWCCA 293
No miscarriage of justice occurred as a result of the jury having unrestricted access to the videotape of the complainant's evidence in chief, given the defence approach, trial judge's directions and warnings, and the nature of the trial. The verdict was not unreasonable or against the weight of the evidence; it was open to the jury to be satisfied of guilt beyond reasonable doubt on all the evidence.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Appellant: RTGS
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Videotaped Evidence, Child Witnesses, Jury Directions, Unreasonable Verdict, Procedural Irregularity, Sexual Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
RTGS
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a miscarriage of justice occurred by allowing the jury unrestricted access to the videotape of the complainant's evidence in chief during deliberations
- 2 Whether the verdict of the jury was unreasonable or against the weight of the evidence
Ratio Decidendi
No miscarriage of justice occurred as a result of the jury having unrestricted access to the videotape of the complainant's evidence in chief, given the defence approach, trial judge's directions and warnings, and the nature of the trial. The verdict was not unreasonable or against the weight of the evidence; it was open to the jury to be satisfied of guilt beyond reasonable doubt on all the evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment