Cufurovic v Coshott [2009] NSWSC 372
Costs incurred before bankruptcy, for which liability merged into judgment and was subsequently discharged by operation of bankruptcy law, are not capable of assessment under statutory procedure; decision of costs assessor made in purported exercise of jurisdiction where none existed amounts to jurisdictional error, entitling plaintiff to administrative law relief.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review/administrative Law Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted; determination of costs assessor quashed; permanent injunction preventing recovery of costs for specified period; costs awarded to plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- ['assessment of Costs' 'effect of Bankruptcy Discharge' 'statutory Costs Assessment Procedure' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review/administrative Law Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs incurred prior to bankruptcy are capable of statutory assessment after discharge' 'Whether administrative review/relief is available against costs assessor determination following bankruptcy discharge' 'Whether privative clause bars relief for jurisdictional error']
Ratio Decidendi
Costs incurred before bankruptcy, for which liability merged into judgment and was subsequently discharged by operation of bankruptcy law, are not capable of assessment under statutory procedure; decision of costs assessor made in purported exercise of jurisdiction where none existed amounts to jurisdictional error, entitling plaintiff to administrative law relief.
Court Disposition
Application granted; determination of costs assessor quashed; permanent injunction preventing recovery of costs for specified period; costs awarded to plaintiff.
Orders
- ['An order in the nature of certiorari quashing the determination of the costs assessor in file 2007/469 dated 27 March 2008.' 'An order permanently restraining the defendant from seeking to recover, by any means, any costs from the plaintiff for work done in the period 1985 – 1988.' "The defendant to pay the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment