Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Dagdanasar [2016] NSWSC 1089
Given the applicant's repeated history of driving whilst disqualified, the alleged further offences despite lengthy disqualification, and the likelihood of relatively lengthy imprisonment if convicted, any further offence of driving whilst disqualified in the circumstances should be considered a serious offence. The risk of further similar offending was high and unacceptable, so bail was refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Release Application / Supreme Court of New South Wales Hearing
- Outcome
- Bail refused
- Legal Topics
- ['bail Refusal' 'unacceptable Risk' 'serious Offence' 'driving Whilst Disqualified' 'bail Act 2013 (nsw) S 18']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bail Release Application / Supreme Court of New South Wales Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant posed an unacceptable risk of failing to appear.' 'Whether the applicant posed an unacceptable risk of endangering the safety of victims, individuals or the community.' 'Whether the applicant posed an unacceptable risk of committing a serious offence if released on bail.' 'Whether further driving whilst disqualified offences could amount to a serious offence for the purposes of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW).']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the applicant's repeated history of driving whilst disqualified, the alleged further offences despite lengthy disqualification, and the likelihood of relatively lengthy imprisonment if convicted, any further offence of driving whilst disqualified in the circumstances should be considered a serious offence. The risk of further similar offending was high and unacceptable, so bail was refused.
Court Disposition
Bail refused
Orders
- ['The application is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment