R v Khoda Doost [2014] NSWDC 327
Although the risks posed by Mr Khoda Doost were significant, his psychiatric vulnerability, deterioration in custody, the likelihood that pre-trial custody would exceed any custodial punishment or equivalent non-parole period, and the availability of very strict conduct conditions meant that the unacceptable risk could be sufficiently mitigated by bail conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Bail Release Application / Application for Bail After Bail Refusal, Before Trial
- Outcome
- Conditional bail granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['unacceptable Risk' 'bail Conditions' 'offending While in Detention' 'psychiatric Vulnerability' 'likely Time in Custody Before Trial']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Bail Release Application / Application for Bail After Bail Refusal, Before Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there were unacceptable risks that Mr Khoda Doost would commit another serious offence or endanger the safety of individuals in the detention centre if released on bail.' 'Whether any unacceptable risk could be sufficiently mitigated by the imposition of bail conditions.' "Whether the likely period in custody before trial and the applicant's psychiatric vulnerability supported granting bail."]
Ratio Decidendi
Although the risks posed by Mr Khoda Doost were significant, his psychiatric vulnerability, deterioration in custody, the likelihood that pre-trial custody would exceed any custodial punishment or equivalent non-parole period, and the availability of very strict conduct conditions meant that the unacceptable risk could be sufficiently mitigated by bail conditions.
Court Disposition
Conditional bail granted.
Orders
- ['Bail granted to Ruhollah Khoda Doost under s 49(3) of the Bail Act 2013.' 'The applicant is to reside at such place as may be determined by the Minister of Immigration.' 'The applicant must not assault, molest, harass, threaten or otherwise interfere with any detention centre staff.' 'The applicant must not engage...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment