Rural Bank Limited v Lloyd [2013] NSWSC 1214
No actual payment or tender was made by the defendant; the purported bill of exchange was not genuine payment. Therefore, there was no basis for staying the proceedings or setting aside the default judgment. The plaintiff is entitled to the writ of possession and costs.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Rural Bank Limited; Defendant: David Lloyd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application for Leave to Issue Writ of Possession; Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Leave granted to issue writ of possession; costs awarded to plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Possession, Default Judgment, Tender of Payment, Estoppel
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rural Bank Limited
Plaintiff
David Lloyd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Leave to Issue Writ of Possession; Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a bill of exchange tendered by the defendant constituted payment satisfying the mortgage debt
- 2 Whether the default judgment should be set aside based on alleged payment/tender
- 3 Whether filing a notice of payment operated as a stay of proceedings under r 6.17 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
Ratio Decidendi
No actual payment or tender was made by the defendant; the purported bill of exchange was not genuine payment. Therefore, there was no basis for staying the proceedings or setting aside the default judgment. The plaintiff is entitled to the writ of possession and costs.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to issue writ of possession; costs awarded to plaintiff.
Orders
- Leave granted to issue writ of possession.
- Plaintiff awarded costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment