Mathews v State of Queensland [2015] FCA 191
It is in the interests of justice that the application for vexatious proceedings orders be heard by a judge other than the judge against whom the scandalous accusations have been made. While the accusations are abusive and offensive and there is no evidence to substantiate them, it is inappropriate for the subject judge to make a determination on them.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Orders Under Vexatious Proceedings Provisions / Order for Hearing to Be Before Another Judge
- Outcome
- Application to be listed before another Judge
- Legal Topics
- ['vexatious Proceedings' 'apprehended Bias' 'application for Certiorari']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Orders Under Vexatious Proceedings Provisions / Order for Hearing to Be Before Another Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant is a vexatious litigant under Part VAAA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)' 'Whether it is appropriate for Rangiah J to determine the application in light of scandalous accusations made against him' 'Whether the accusations made against Rangiah J should be determined as scandalous and unfounded in this proceeding']
Ratio Decidendi
It is in the interests of justice that the application for vexatious proceedings orders be heard by a judge other than the judge against whom the scandalous accusations have been made. While the accusations are abusive and offensive and there is no evidence to substantiate them, it is inappropriate for the subject judge to make a determination on them.
Court Disposition
Application to be listed before another Judge
Orders
- ['The application for orders under Part VAAA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) filed by the first respondent be listed for hearing before a judge other than Rangiah J.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment