Price v ClearView Life Nominees Pty Limited [2024] NSWSC 706
ClearView's proposed use of material produced in the TPD proceedings to assess Mr Price's IP Policy entitlement would be collateral to the purpose for which the material was produced and would breach the implied undertaking. Although the identity of parties and some overlap between the issues under the two policies constituted special circumstances sufficient to enliven the discretion, the Court declined release because there was no dispute or proceeding concerning the IP Policy, opportunity and convenience were insufficient, the material could be used adversely to Mr Price, and release would enlarge ClearView's access to information beyond its contractual rights under the IP Policy.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Applications List; Civil Procedure Motion Concerning Release From Implied Undertaking in Insurance Proceedings / Notice of Motion Filed 9 April 2024 Seeking a Declaration Or, Alternatively, Leave to Use Material Produced in TPD Proceedings for Assessment of Income Protection Benefits; Heard 3 and 16 May 2024; Decided 12 June 2024
- Outcome
- Motion for release from implied undertaking dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['implied Undertaking' 'harman Undertaking' 'release From Implied Undertaking' 'special Circumstances' 'total and Permanent Disablement Insurance' 'income Protection Insurance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Applications List; Civil Procedure Motion Concerning Release From Implied Undertaking in Insurance Proceedings / Notice of Motion Filed 9 April 2024 Seeking a Declaration Or, Alternatively, Leave to Use Material Produced in TPD Proceedings for Assessment of Income Protection Benefits; Heard 3 and 16 May 2024; Decided 12 June 2024
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether ClearView's proposed use of documents, affidavits and expert reports produced in the TPD proceedings to assess Mr Price's ongoing entitlement under the IP Policy would breach the implied undertaking." 'Whether the identity of parties and overlap of issues between the TPD Policy and IP Policy constituted special circumstances justifying release from the implied undertaking.' 'Whether the Court should exercise its discretion to release ClearView from the implied undertaking in circumstances where there was no dispute or litigation on foot concerning the IP Policy.']
Ratio Decidendi
ClearView's proposed use of material produced in the TPD proceedings to assess Mr Price's IP Policy entitlement would be collateral to the purpose for which the material was produced and would breach the implied undertaking. Although the identity of parties and some overlap between the issues under the two policies constituted special circumstances sufficient to enliven the discretion, the Court declined release because there was no dispute or proceeding concerning the IP Policy, opportunity and convenience were insufficient, the material could be used adversely to Mr Price, and release would enlarge ClearView's access to information beyond its contractual rights under the IP Policy.
Court Disposition
Motion for release from implied undertaking dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ["ClearView's motion dismissed." 'Subject to hearing the parties, costs should follow the event.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment