Rusty Man Pty Ltd v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2024] NSWLEC 1110
The Court, being satisfied that the jurisdictional prerequisites for grant of consent were met—specifically, that the written request for variation of the height standard is adequate, that the planning and environmental impacts are acceptable, that heritage and statutory requirements are addressed, and that the consent can be conditioned appropriately—ordered that consent be granted to the amended development application and that the applicant pay the respondent's thrown away costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Orders After Conciliation Conference Following Deemed Refusal, Decision on Amended Development Application
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld, development consent granted subject to conditions, costs thrown away ordered against applicant.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'land Use Consent' 'environmental Planning Instruments' 'heritage' 'building Height Standard' 'mixed Use Development' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Orders After Conciliation Conference Following Deemed Refusal, Decision on Amended Development Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether development consent should be granted for demolition of a local heritage item and construction of a mixed use development exceeding height limits' 'Whether written request for variation of building height standard under cl 4.6 of the Eurobodalla Local Environmental Plan 2012 is adequate' 'Whether development complies with relevant State and local environmental planning policies' 'Whether jurisdictional prerequisites for consent are satisfied' 'Entitlement to costs thrown away']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court, being satisfied that the jurisdictional prerequisites for grant of consent were met—specifically, that the written request for variation of the height standard is adequate, that the planning and environmental impacts are acceptable, that heritage and statutory requirements are addressed, and that the consent can be conditioned appropriately—ordered that consent be granted to the amended development application and that the applicant pay the respondent's thrown away costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld, development consent granted subject to conditions, costs thrown away ordered against applicant.
Orders
- ["Applicant to pay Respondent's costs thrown away due to amendment of application in the amount of $8,000 within 30 days." 'Appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No DA0604/23 is determined by the grant of consent for the demolition of existing local heritage item and construction of mixed use development,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment