Graham v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2024] NSWCATOD 17
The evidence did not satisfy the Tribunal that the Applicant had successfully completed a Certificate IV in Plumbing or a Certificate IV in Gas Fitting, or that any replacement qualification under s 33F(2) applied. Because s 33F(1A) of the Home Building Act 1989 provides that a contractor licence must not be endorsed for medical gasfitting work unless the specified qualification requirement is satisfied, the application to vary the licence had to be refused and the decision under review was affirmed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review of Licensing Decision / Review of Decision Refusing Application to Vary Contractor Licence to Include Medical Gasfitting
- Outcome
- The decision under review is affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- ['administrative Review' 'contractor Licence Variation' 'medical Gasfitting Licence Qualifications' 'home Building Act 1989 S 33 F']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review of Licensing Decision / Review of Decision Refusing Application to Vary Contractor Licence to Include Medical Gasfitting
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Applicant had the requisite qualifications for the issue of an endorsed contractor licence authorising medical gasfitting work.' "Whether the Tribunal should affirm or set aside the Respondent's refusal of the application to vary the Applicant's contractor licence."]
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence did not satisfy the Tribunal that the Applicant had successfully completed a Certificate IV in Plumbing or a Certificate IV in Gas Fitting, or that any replacement qualification under s 33F(2) applied. Because s 33F(1A) of the Home Building Act 1989 provides that a contractor licence must not be endorsed for medical gasfitting work unless the specified qualification requirement is satisfied, the application to vary the licence had to be refused and the decision under review was affirmed.
Court Disposition
The decision under review is affirmed.
Orders
- ['The decision under review is affirmed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment