MACKENZIE v R (No 2) [2012] NSWCCA 122
The orders made on 25 February 2011 transposed the sentences for CAN 3 and CAN 4, thereby increasing the sentence for CAN 4 even though it was not the subject of appeal and had been described as not open to variation; the orders in respect of CAN 3 and CAN 4 were therefore set aside and corrected.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Law Appeal Variation of Order / Consequential Orders
- Outcome
- Orders in respect of CAN 3 and CAN 4 made on 25 February 2011 set aside; the Applicant was sentenced on CANs 3 and 4 as corrected.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal' 'variation of Order' 'sentencing' 'correction of Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law Appeal Variation of Order / Consequential Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the orders made on 25 February 2011 incorrectly transposed the sentences for CAN 3 and CAN 4.' 'Whether the orders in respect of CAN 3 and CAN 4 should be set aside and corrected.']
Ratio Decidendi
The orders made on 25 February 2011 transposed the sentences for CAN 3 and CAN 4, thereby increasing the sentence for CAN 4 even though it was not the subject of appeal and had been described as not open to variation; the orders in respect of CAN 3 and CAN 4 were therefore set aside and corrected.
Court Disposition
Orders in respect of CAN 3 and CAN 4 made on 25 February 2011 set aside; the Applicant was sentenced on CANs 3 and 4 as corrected.
Orders
- ['Set aside the orders in respect of CAN 3 and CAN 4 made on 25 February 2011.' 'CAN 4: imprisonment for a fixed term of 1 year commencing on 28 August 2010 expiring on 27 August 2011.' 'CAN 3: imprisonment for a non-parole period of 8 months to commence on 28 June 2011 and expiring on 27 February 2012 and a balance...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment