Rye 10 Pty Ltd v Bayside Council [2024] NSWLEC 1021
The Court granted the Modification Application because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could make: the modified development remained substantially the same as the 2018 consent, Water NSW consultation and updated terms were addressed, notification and submissions requirements were satisfied, and relevant matters under ss 4.15 and 4.55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 did not preclude approval.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Modification Application Under S 4.55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Orders Following S 34 Conciliation Conference Agreement
- Outcome
- Consent granted to Modification Application MDA2023/90 and development consent DA-2017/194 modified.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'boarding House Development' 'conciliation Conference' 'substantially the Same Development' 'environmental Planning Assessment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Modification Application Under S 4.55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Orders Following S 34 Conciliation Conference Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the agreement reached at the conciliation conference was a decision the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.' 'Whether the development as modified was substantially the same development as the development for which consent was originally granted under s 4.55(2)(a) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' 'Whether consultation, notification and consideration of submissions requirements under s 4.55(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 were satisfied.' 'Whether relevant matters under s 4.15(1) and the reasons for the original consent were considered as required by s 4.55(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court granted the Modification Application because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could make: the modified development remained substantially the same as the 2018 consent, Water NSW consultation and updated terms were addressed, notification and submissions requirements were satisfied, and relevant matters under ss 4.15 and 4.55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 did not preclude approval.
Court Disposition
Consent granted to Modification Application MDA2023/90 and development consent DA-2017/194 modified.
Orders
- ['Consent is granted to Modification Application MDA2023/90.' 'Development consent DA-2017/194, granted by the Land and Environment Court on 31 January 2018, is modified in the terms in Annexure A.' 'Development consent DA-2017/194, as modified by the Court, is Annexure B.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment