Yoshino v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1414
The Federal Court had no jurisdiction to hear the application due to s 476A(3)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth). Even if jurisdiction existed, the application was hopeless and amounted to an abuse of process.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Final Judgment on Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction; costs awarded to first respondent
- Legal Topics
- ['jurisdiction of Federal Court' 'extension of Time to Appeal' 'procedural Fairness']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Final Judgment on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a Federal Circuit Court decision refusing an extension of time to review a Migration Review Tribunal decision' 'Whether the interests of the administration of justice require the extension of time' 'Whether procedural fairness was denied to the applicant']
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court had no jurisdiction to hear the application due to s 476A(3)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth). Even if jurisdiction existed, the application was hopeless and amounted to an abuse of process.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction; costs awarded to first respondent
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed for want of jurisdiction pursuant to s 476A(3)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' "The applicant pay first respondent's costs as taxed or agreed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment