S v Boulton (Examiner, Australian Crime Commission) [2006] FCAFC 99
The common law privilege against spousal incrimination does not extend to de facto spouses. Even if such privilege exists, the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) abrogates it. Public interest immunity does not apply to protect de facto spousal privilege.
- Parties
- Appellant: S; First Respondent: William McLean Boulton (Examiner, Australian Crime Commission); Second Respondent: Australian Crime Commission
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Spousal Privilege, Privilege Against Self Incrimination, Competence and Compellability of Witnesses, Statutory Abrogation of Privilege, Public Interest Immunity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S
Appellant
William McLean Boulton (Examiner, Australian Crime Commission)
First Respondent
Australian Crime Commission
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the common law recognise a privilege against spousal incrimination?
- 2 If so, does the privilege extend to de facto spouses?
- 3 Whether, if the privilege exists, it is excluded by the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth).
Ratio Decidendi
The common law privilege against spousal incrimination does not extend to de facto spouses. Even if such privilege exists, the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) abrogates it. Public interest immunity does not apply to protect de facto spousal privilege.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- The appeal be dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment