Harb v Wyong Shire Council (No 2) [2004] NSWLEC 724
The application for costs is allowed to the extent of the Council’s concession—that the Council is to pay the actual costs incurred by the applicant regarding the work on DCP 81 after its late disclosure, and the costs of the costs hearing, but not the entire costs of the proceedings because the proposal also failed...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application / Post Merits Judgment; Application for Costs
- Outcome
- Application for costs partially granted
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'development Control Plans' 'procedural Fairness']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Application / Post Merits Judgment; Application for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Council should pay the applicant’s costs due to failure to disclose DCP 81.' 'Extent to which Council’s omission affected the applicant’s case and entitlement to costs.' 'Proper division and scope of costs recoverable.']
Ratio Decidendi
The application for costs is allowed to the extent of the Council’s concession—that the Council is to pay the actual costs incurred by the applicant regarding the work on DCP 81 after its late disclosure, and the costs of the costs hearing, but not the entire costs of the proceedings because the proposal also failed for other reasons unrelated to DCP 81.
Court Disposition
Application for costs partially granted
Orders
- ['Council to pay applicant’s actual costs incurred for work relating to DCP 81 after adjournment on 30 September, including clerical support costs.' 'Council to pay applicant’s costs of the costs application on agreed or assessed basis.' 'Parties have 14 days to make submissions to the Chief Judge regarding the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment