S J Connelly CPP Pty Ltd v Ballina Shire Council [2010] NSWLEC 128
The proposed development does not involve an industrial process as defined in clause 19(1) of Schedule 3 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 and is therefore not designated development requiring an environmental impact statement.
- Parties
- Applicant: S J Connelly CPP Pty Ltd; Respondent: Ballina Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Designated Development, Interpretation of 'industry', Stockpiling Extractive Material
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S J Connelly CPP Pty Ltd
Applicant
Ballina Shire Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the development application is in respect of designated development under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
- 2 Whether the proposed stockpiling constitutes 'extractive industry' under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000
- 3 Whether the development is ancillary to the Ballina Bypass project
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed development does not involve an industrial process as defined in clause 19(1) of Schedule 3 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 and is therefore not designated development requiring an environmental impact statement.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Declare that DA 2010/623 is not an application in respect of designated development under s 78A(8)(a) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
- Respondent to pay applicant's costs unless a notice of motion regarding costs is filed within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment