S & R Properties Pty Limited v Ashfield Municipal Council [2007] NSWLEC 72
The appeal is upheld as the council's proposed condition relating to the reconstruction of the footpath, contingent on possible carriageway narrowing, is unreasonable and lacks certainty. Consent to modify the development approval is granted subject to conditions, excluding the disputed condition.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Modification Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal upheld and modification application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'conditions of Development Approval' 'heritage Significance' 'stormwater Management' 'materials and Finishes' 'damage Deposit']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Modification Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed modification complies with planning controls' "Whether the council's proposed condition regarding footpath reconstruction is reasonable" 'Compliance with stormwater management requirements' 'Impact of materials and finishes on heritage and streetscape' 'Appropriateness of damage deposit requirement']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld as the council's proposed condition relating to the reconstruction of the footpath, contingent on possible carriageway narrowing, is unreasonable and lacks certainty. Consent to modify the development approval is granted subject to conditions, excluding the disputed condition.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld and modification application granted
Orders
- ['The appeal under s 96AA(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 is upheld.' 'The modification application filed 31 October 2006 to amend the development consent granted by the Court on 19 March 2004 and subsequently amended by the respondent on 13 December 2005 be approved subject to Conditions A1...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment