Wilkinson v S & S Gikas Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1314
Relief against forfeiture is granted because, although the plaintiffs’ ability to pay future rent is in doubt, they have some resources and the rental is not large compared to their equity. Payment of arrears, legal costs, and locksmith costs is required, but the costs of the security guard are not to be made a condition since such costs were not caused by the plaintiffs' breach in a manner relevant to equitable relief. Payment of costs of proceedings is not a precondition, but plaintiffs are ordered to pay defendant’s costs.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: John Paul Wilkinson; Second Plaintiff: Karen Therese Wilkinson; Defendant: S & S Gikas Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Relief Against Forfeiture / Final Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Relief against forfeiture granted, subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Relief Against Forfeiture, Termination of Tenancy, Equitable Remedies, Terms for Granting Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Paul Wilkinson
First Plaintiff
Karen Therese Wilkinson
Second Plaintiff
S & S Gikas Pty Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Relief Against Forfeiture / Final Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether relief against forfeiture of lease should be granted to the plaintiffs
- 2 What terms or conditions (including payment of arrears, legal expenses, costs of re-entry, and security guard costs) should be imposed for relief against forfeiture
- 3 Whether payment of the costs of the present proceedings ought to be a precondition for relief
Ratio Decidendi
Relief against forfeiture is granted because, although the plaintiffs’ ability to pay future rent is in doubt, they have some resources and the rental is not large compared to their equity. Payment of arrears, legal costs, and locksmith costs is required, but the costs of the security guard are not to be made a condition since such costs were not caused by the plaintiffs' breach in a manner relevant to equitable relief. Payment of costs of proceedings is not a precondition, but plaintiffs are ordered to pay defendant’s costs.
Court Disposition
Relief against forfeiture granted, subject to conditions.
Orders
- Plaintiffs to pay $3,185 to defendant’s solicitor within 24 hours (legal expenses, locksmith fee, security guard attendance for two hours)
- Plaintiffs to pay $5,815 into court within fourteen days as security for any additional costs or amounts as determined
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment