S1466 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1093

S1466 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1093

The application for extension of time was dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate any arguable case on the merits of the appeal, and the cited grounds lacked substance.

Parties
Applicant: S1466 of 2003; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 August 2006
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Determination of Extension Application
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time to Appeal, Procedural Fairness, Natural Justice
Administrative Law Immigration Law Extension of Time to Appeal Procedural Fairness Natural Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

S1466 of 2003

Applicant

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

First Respondent

Refugee Review Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Determination of Extension Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal should be granted
  2. 2 Whether there was a denial of procedural fairness or natural justice in the underlying decision

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time was dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate any arguable case on the merits of the appeal, and the cited grounds lacked substance.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application be dismissed with costs assessed in the sum of $1000.