S1914 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 577
The application is dismissed because all issues raised could have been or were already litigated and are barred by Anshun estoppel and issue estoppel; s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) was not applicable to the Tribunal hearing, and the Federal Magistrate's judgment was correct.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Final Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'anshun Estoppel' 'issue Estoppel' 'procedural Fairness' 'protection Visa']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Final Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal was affected by denial of procedural fairness or bias' "Whether the Federal Magistrate's decision was improper or in breach of natural justice" 'Whether Anshun estoppel and issue estoppel precluded the applicant from re-raising matters litigated in previous proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
The application is dismissed because all issues raised could have been or were already litigated and are barred by Anshun estoppel and issue estoppel; s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) was not applicable to the Tribunal hearing, and the Federal Magistrate's judgment was correct.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment