S2013 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2004] FCA 1764
The application for an order nisi was refused because the material before the Court did not disclose an arguable case for Constitutional writ relief, the further material the applicant wished to collect would not address any ground for review or the substantial delay, and there was no utility in granting further time.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application for an Order Nisi Seeking Writ Relief in Respect of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa / Application for Order Nisi Refused
- Outcome
- Application for an order nisi refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'procedural Fairness' 'constitutional Writ Relief' 'extension of Time']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for an Order Nisi Seeking Writ Relief in Respect of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa / Application for Order Nisi Refused
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be given further time to file material in support of the application for an order nisi.' "Whether the material disclosed an arguable case for Constitutional writ relief in respect of the Tribunal's decision." 'Whether delay in commencement of review proceedings could be overcome.']
Ratio Decidendi
The application for an order nisi was refused because the material before the Court did not disclose an arguable case for Constitutional writ relief, the further material the applicant wished to collect would not address any ground for review or the substantial delay, and there was no utility in granting further time.
Court Disposition
Application for an order nisi refused.
Orders
- ['The application for an order nisi be refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment