S247/2003 v The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1494
The applicant failed to make out an arguable case suggesting reviewable error or any argument warranting the granting of an order nisi; therefore, the application must be dismissed with costs.
- Parties
- Applicant: S247/2003; First Respondent: The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Second Respondent: Principal Member of the Refugee Review Tribunal; Third Respondent: Member of the Refugee Review Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Migration / Application for Order Nisi Following Remittal From High Court
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Refugee Law, Procedural Fairness, Jurisdictional Error, Natural Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S247/2003
Applicant
The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
First Respondent
Principal Member of the Refugee Review Tribunal
Second Respondent
Member of the Refugee Review Tribunal
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Migration / Application for Order Nisi Following Remittal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a reviewable error in the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to accord procedural fairness
- 3 Whether there was jurisdictional error or lack of natural justice
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to make out an arguable case suggesting reviewable error or any argument warranting the granting of an order nisi; therefore, the application must be dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application for an order nisi is dismissed.
- The applicant to pay respondents' costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment