Applicant S281 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2004] FCA 906
The applications for orders nisi were refused because, on the material before the Court, there was no evidence supporting the assertions in the draft orders nisi and no arguable case was shown for the grant of constitutional relief.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Order Nisi Seeking Constitutional Writ Relief in Respect of Refugee Review Tribunal Decisions Affirming Refusal of Protection Visas / On Remittal From the High Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Applications for orders nisi refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['refugee Review Tribunal' 'protection Visa' 'natural Justice' 'procedural Fairness' 'constitutional Writ Relief' 'order Nisi']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Order Nisi Seeking Constitutional Writ Relief in Respect of Refugee Review Tribunal Decisions Affirming Refusal of Protection Visas / On Remittal From the High Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicants had shown an arguable case for constitutional writ relief in respect of the Tribunal decisions.' 'Whether the applications for orders nisi should be refused because the assertions of denial of natural justice and procedural fairness were unsupported by evidence.']
Ratio Decidendi
The applications for orders nisi were refused because, on the material before the Court, there was no evidence supporting the assertions in the draft orders nisi and no arguable case was shown for the grant of constitutional relief.
Court Disposition
Applications for orders nisi refused.
Orders
- ['Order 51A rule 5(1) not apply.' 'The application for an order nisi be refused.' 'The adult applicants in each case pay the costs of the Minister of the proceedings to date.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment