SZTPW v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 564
The Federal Circuit Court did not err in finding that the Tribunal did not breach s 424A(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), as the relevant information was not shown to be a reason or part of the reason for affirming the decision, and the Tribunal's adverse credibility findings were based on the appellants' own testimony, not on the additional information identified.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['s 424 a Migration Act' 'procedural Fairness' 'refugee Status Determination']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal breached s 424A(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by failing to provide certain information to the appellants' 'Whether the Tribunal was required to give information that would be the reason or part of the reason for affirming the decision']
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Circuit Court did not err in finding that the Tribunal did not breach s 424A(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), as the relevant information was not shown to be a reason or part of the reason for affirming the decision, and the Tribunal's adverse credibility findings were based on the appellants' own testimony, not on the additional information identified.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellants pay the first respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment